Reader must not mistake
debate as an argument. Debate is a broader form of argument and it is well organised
but here I want to share our thirst on day to day argument and perception in
its outcomes. Person in heat of argument will always tries to win as his/her
belief overshadows wisdom. Why do we always ascertain that volume will succeed
when science of reasoning won’t? I can assume that we all are on agreement that
winning such argument always leaves a nexus in the relationship. It is also
very difficult to draw a line where argument should freeze as there is no
boundary in friendship. In contrast it becomes easier with strangers. If we
happen to evaluate the situation in leisure then we will find ourselves always at
losing end as we might have lost potential friend/well-wisher in stranger. For
time being we can contend by saying that we don’t care stranger but life may have
its own plans to arrange another meeting between both.
Cartoon source is internet. Not mine. |
I am not suggesting that we
should completely avoid argument but I am sure we all should not create it a
prestige issue while putting our point of view. Argument is part and parcel of
our life. We engage in several arguments with various people such as friends,
Cousins, loved ones, spouse, parents, boss, colleague at work and strangers as
well. Argument topics could be anything; I leave this to reader’s imagination. Everyone
has interest in some subject/fields and when one happen to challenge the same from
another angle it is the best opportunity for both parties to argue and sharpen/broaden
the knowledge repository. I personally have lost few friends for sake of
winning an argument but was lucky enough to gain them back when meeting them in
different forum. May be we both realised that if we really want to part away then
we can look for better reason rather for minor reason of argument outcome. I realised that gaining them is more valuable
in terms of moving ahead in life. It was not worth at all losing someone on
argument behalf. This is also not a suggestion that we should compromise with
our values just to keep our friends intact but we should not misinterpret
argument outcome as our values. Friendship is something which is stronger than
blood relation; it is only because part of our values system; character and a
feeling of completeness is mirrored in another person who is called as
‘FRIEND’. So this relation should only get break when any of these parameters
decline.
Our ancestor had told that person
become mature in earning bread phase when he/she hits life reality. This is the
phase where one’s wisdom is judged as it is broadly unwrapped from all sides. During
this stage individual decisions are rarely challenged as it used to be during
teenagers. Do you remember ‘As you sow,
so shall you reap’ it means ‘something that you say which means everything
that happens to you is a result of your own action. If we keep ourselves tied
up for argument sake and busy handling its unpleasant consequences then we are
missing lots of other opportunity which we might have created or grasped. We
have heard Silence is golden but why
we always miss an opportunity to apply it. Argument is best place to apply once
you feel that you have put across your point politely and other party in no way
inclined to accept then Silence is best medium to avoid aftermath consequence.
You will soon realise that everyone is coming to a conclusion of some sort. But
more we speak murkier it gets. Also it was rightly pointed by Thomas Carlyle ‘a man lives by believing something: not by
debating and arguing about many things.’
Now another angle to look
at argument is in form of constructive and destructive. If we are smart enough
to judge the on-going argument status then it is win-win situation for all. However
it is very hard to realise in middle of argument when to cease. From my past
experience, what best I can suggest is to go in silence and listen to what
other party is saying on culmination that no one is appreciating your view. You
can pacify yourself with inkling that either you have piled up ideas which you
can easily demolish with counter arguments (remember
Edison quote from my previous blog Failure:What is it!) or you really
have reaped some good points. In all ways you will be the winner. I remember a
famous quote of Edward Koch ‘You punch
me, I punch back. I do not believe it's good for ones self-respect to be a
punching bag.’ Let’s not demolish our self- respect for argument sake.
Thank You!
Satender Kumar Mall
Twitter: satenderiiit